Women's boyfriend broke up demand write down 200000 ious court sentenced to the invalid

Ms. Chen and Mr. Zhang fell in love and three years later, because of bad blood break up, ms. Chen asks Mr Zhang write a bill of $200000. Since then she hold on this bill will Mr. Zhang sued to court, ask Mr. Zhang pay $200000 debt. Yesterday, North Face 3 in 1 Jackets the reporter learns, haidian court ascertained that the $200000 belong to "break up fees", violate social ethics, and sentenced to ms. Chen losing.

Ms Chen said, she met with Mr. Zhang in 2005, the following year established relationship. Get along with three years later, Mr. Zhang to her up, she agreed. Because once in love for Mr. Zhang during had bought a large jade, senior tea and items, so both parties Mr. North Face Denali Jackets Zhang to pay her $200000, and write down the ious. But two people after break up, Mr. Zhang has been refused to pay debt, so Sue to the court for Mr. Zhang reimbursement.

In the trial of Mr Zhang says he and ms. Chen actually does not exist the real relationship of creditor's rights debt. He certainly had written ious, but actually the money is on the bill a "break up fees", not the both parties of the liquidation of the purchase of goods, and he is a former girlfriend by threatening situation of write ious, and now do not agree to pay.

The court said that, Mr. Zhang claims actually owe "break up fees" properties, and to provide the recording material for card court. And ms. Chen to his own statement did not give evidence. So can maintain the owed bill with "break up fees" nature, north face jackets cheap there was not in fact the relationship of creditor's rights debt, and "break up fees" don't conform to social public order principle of good morals, the court to ms. Chen's litigation claims not to support. Final sentence dismissed the lawsuit.